Coreal.
Book a working session →
01Solutions / Telco-Fintech

The telco brings the customer.
Coreal brings the rest.

Everyday money averages roughly a quarter of a subscriber's monthly budget. Funds already flow through captive third-party services — we make that flow more efficient. Coreal turns user habits into a synergic financial relationship — with a clear benefit for the operator and the customer.

Reachable telecom base
10–15M
daily reach
Regional secondary market
~2–3M
regional anchor
Coreal cards already issued
100k
wallet primitives
JV time-to-Wave-1
90 days
partner-led MVP
Built for telecoms with
OIBDA margin: 50%+Net Debt / OIBDA: ≤ 1.0CAPEX-to-sales: ~30%Service revenue YoY: +10–14%ARPU $3–8: CIS · CEE · MENASelf-service penetration: 70%+
02Industry precedent

Telecoms invented this.
Now the EU market is ready for it.

Three operators across Africa and Latin America turned their subscriber base into a financial services business — in markets with no existing banking infrastructure. Combined: 149M users, £2.2B annual revenue. The EU has better infrastructure, tighter regulation, and higher ARPU potential. The only thing missing is the operating layer. Coreal builds this operating layer.

Combined users
149M
three operators · three continents
Combined revenue
£2.2B
annual · three operators
Years to first £1B
12
fastest case · 2007 → 2019
Common denominator
The subscriber
no new customer acquisition required
East African telco · dominant operator
Mobile money — East Africa
East Africa → 10 markets · est. 2007
Users
51M
Revenue
£1.4B

The original proof.

Launched on a 2G network. No bank accounts, no smartphones, no fintech regulation. Just 51 million subscribers who already trusted the operator with their airtime top-up. The service moved $314B in 2023 — more than the host country's GDP. It is the most cited fintech success story in the world, and it started because a telecom operator decided to do more than sell minutes.

KEY SIGNAL

Revenue grew from £0 to £1.4B in 17 years — without acquiring a single new customer outside the existing subscriber base.

Pan-African telco · 17 markets
Mobile money — West & Central Africa
West / Central Africa · est. 2008
Users
80M
Revenue
£620M

Scale via distribution.

A pan-African carrier replicated the playbook across 17 markets using the same subscriber distribution advantage. No physical branches. No separate banking app to download. The mobile money product became the mobile plan, the wallet, and the remittance product in one. The operator's retail agents became the cash on-ramp. 80M users without a marketing budget — because the network was already there.

KEY SIGNAL

80M users across 17 markets. CAC ≈ £0. The subscriber base was the growth channel.

Latin American telco · multi-market
Mobile money — Latin America
Latin America · est. 2009
Users
18M
Revenue
£140M

SME and B2B at scale.

A Latin American carrier extended the model into SME merchant payments — QR, agent payouts, B2B transfers. By embedding merchant acceptance alongside the subscriber wallet, the product became both sides of the transaction. The SME attach rate produced the highest ARPU in the portfolio: a merchant who settles with you daily does not churn.

KEY SIGNAL

SME merchant attach drove ARPU to 2.4× the consumer average. B2B is the multiplier on any telecom fintech deployment.

THE EU ADVANTAGE

Better ingredients than the pioneers had.

EU subscribers already have smartphones, debit cards and some banking relationship. Fintech regulation (PSD2, EMD2, MiCA) is clear and enforceable. SEPA makes instant credit transfers free at the rail level. The infrastructure that took the original deployments 10 years to build from scratch is already in place. The operator contribution — distribution, identity, trust — is the same.

THE MISSING PIECE

A regulated fintech OS designed for telecoms.

None of the original deployments had access to a ledger-first platform with built-in EU compliance, multi-provider orchestration and a workflow engine that produces audit trails a regulator can read. Coreal is what you build it with in 2025 — not what you retrofit onto an SMS system designed in 2006.

EU precedents · what to keep, what to avoid

The EU has tried this four times.
Three closed. One is a super-app.

Telecom-fintech is not new in Europe. The pattern of failure is predictable: narrow product, partner-bank misalignment, no telco-aware risk model. The pattern of success — one super-app ran the playbook without the telco — proves the consumer demand. We took both lessons.

EU · DE
O2 Banking
Tier-1 mobile + Fidor partnership
Closed 2020
KEEP

Wallet inside the operator app · distribution via 1,500 retail stores

AVOID

Fidor partnership ended; no telco-aware risk model; product was a basic checking account, not embedded into telecom flows

EU · ES
Movistar Money
Tier-1 mobile + own EMI licence
Live · narrow
KEEP

Device-finance + small consumer credit, embedded in postpaid bill · ARPU lift on attached customers

AVOID

Stayed inside credit only; never expanded into payments, cards, or remittance — left 80% of revenue pools on the table

EU · FR
Free Mobile bundles
Iliad — bundle hook, no licence
Live · marketing only
KEEP

Free Carte Bancaire as a bundle benefit reduced churn measurably

AVOID

Bundle, not a product — no separate ledger, no own revenue line, no EU passport, capped at the home market

CIS · UA
monobank
Super-app, no operator
Live · 7.5M users
KEEP

Proves CIS consumer is super-app-native: 7.5M users in 5 years, no branches, no telco · ran the playbook the telco should have run

AVOID

No connectivity dimension, no SIM identity, no roaming risk signal — the gap a telecom partner closes

WHAT WE BUILT FROM THESE LESSONS

Multi-product from day one (wallet, card, autopay, remittance — not just credit). Telco-aware risk model using consented signals (SIM age, roaming, device). Own EU regulated entity for ring-fencing, not partner-bank dependency. Wave-staged roadmap so the first 90 days ship a real wallet, not a one-feature pilot.

03Inside the experience

Everyday money flows.
Three things the user actually does.

WAVE 1

Family top-up — same login

1Tap "Sister · London" in Family widget
2Confirm $ 6.00 with FaceID
3Posted to ledger · 38ms · receipt to chat

Identity inherited from the telecom partner. Posting on Coreal's double-entry ledger.

WAVE 2

Card-to-card with telco-aware risk

1User initiates card-to-card €420
2Risk: SIM age 4y · device known · roaming = home
3Auto-approve · score 0.04 · no step-up

Risk model fed by telco signals under explicit consent.

WAVE 3

Regional SME — QR + payouts

1Merchant onboards via telecom SIM identity
2QR live in 8 minutes · locally licensed
3Daily payout to merchant IBAN · reconciled

SIM + connectivity + payments as one B2B bundle.

04Reducing churn

Each financial attachment is a new switching cost.

Telecom churn is not a brand problem. It is an inertia problem. Coreal turns every flow inside the telco app into a small, compounding piece of friction between the subscriber and the carrier next door — and we measure each one.

Annual churn — baseline
14–22%
tier-1 EU postpaid
Annual churn — heavy fintech-user
6–9%
wallet + card + autopay
Net churn delta
−40 to −55%
observed across 4 deployments
Lifetime ARPU uplift
+22%
longer tenure × bundle attach
CH-1+34pp attach

Autopay attach

A subscriber who has linked autopay to a wallet on the telco app does not casually port-out. They have to set up direct debit again somewhere else, in another app, with another verification flow. The friction is real.

CH-2−18% port-out

Wallet balance held

A subscriber with €50–500 sitting in the in-app wallet has financial inertia. The balance is not blocked — they can transfer out at any time — but the existence of the balance is the most under-rated retention lever in operator economics.

CH-3−25% churn

Card in Apple/Google Pay

Once a Coreal-issued virtual Visa is provisioned to Apple Pay, the customer transacts daily off the same wallet. Switching telecom now requires re-issuing a card, re-tokenising, re-provisioning. A two-day project for the customer; a permanent retention asset for the telco.

CH-4−42% churn

Family / diaspora corridor

When the customer's sister abroad sends money home to this number, churn becomes a multi-party decision. Switching telecoms means giving the family member a new identifier in their app. This single mechanism produces the biggest observed churn drop in our deployments.

CH-5−12% per bundle

Bundled telco services on one wallet

Mobile · broadband · TV · IoT subscriptions all settle on the same wallet. Each new bundled service adds a discrete switching task. The math compounds.

CH-6−30% on credit holders

Embedded credit (Wave 2+)

Device finance and short-term credit underwritten on telco data signals. A customer with an active loan does not port-out — and a customer with a clean repayment history is more likely to upgrade than to leave.

Effect ranges shown are observed in production deployments under partner NDA. Magnitude varies by market (postpaid mix, MVNO competition, regulator stance on switching). Numbers are tightened against your specific market in the working session.

Resilience parity

The financial layer should not be the weak link in a network
that has stayed up through power cuts, infrastructure attacks and weather.

Coreal's control plane is engineered for the same operational reality your network already operates in: blackout-tolerant infrastructure, multi-region failover, idempotent retries, sub-second recovery, energy-independent edge nodes. We test against the same threat model you do — power loss, route loss, data-centre loss — not against a SaaS uptime SLA written for a different continent.

p99 ledger posting
< 100ms
across all postings
Multi-AZ failover RTO
< 30s
compliance APIs survive single-AZ loss
Edge recovery
sub-2s
warm DNS / TLS failover
Operational continuity
4 yrs
partner-grade uptime under conflict ops
05Demarcation

What the telco owns.
What Coreal owns.

Two columns. Eight crosspoints. No third party in the demarcation — regulatory and provider relationships sit on top of this split, not inside it.

What they bring

Telecom operator

distribution · brand · billing · identity · footprint
TEL-1Primary mobile app
10–15M monthly-active subscribers
TEL-2Authenticated identity
SIM-bound · already verified · biometric login
TEL-3Billing rails
recurring · dunning · scheme of payment habit
TEL-4Brand & trust
a name customers already pay every month
TEL-5Telco data signals
SIM age · recharge · device · roaming (under consent)
TEL-6Retail / agent footprint
KYC support · cash on/off-ramp · physical reach
TEL-7Regulator relationship
pre-existing dialogue with the national authority
S-01
Distribution × product
Telco app traffic + Coreal wallet primitives → CAC ≈ £0
S-02
Billing × wallet
Telco bill becomes the financial habit → autopay attach +34pp
S-03
Telco data × risk
SIM/recharge/device + Coreal risk gate → fraud −42%
S-04
Identity × KYC
SIM-bound identity + Coreal tier policy → onboarding 38s p95
S-05
BPM × compliance
Workflow engine + journal + human gates → audit-ready by default
S-06
Ledger × multi-provider
One double-entry core + 12 swappable providers → provider portability
S-07
Footprint × cash
Telco retail/agents + Coreal on-ramp → cash in/out without a branch
S-08
Time-to-Wave-1
Distribution + control plane → 90 days to first customer
What they bring

Coreal

fintech operating system · ledger · BPM · operator surface
CRL-1Double-entry ledger
14.2k tps · 0.00 bps drift · audit-grade
CRL-2Wallet & mobile backend
IBAN · cards · SEPA · crypto on one model
CRL-3Provider gateway
12 providers behind one contract · 200ms failover
CRL-4BPM workflow engine
38 versioned processes · case journals · replay
CRL-5KYC / KYT / AML
tier-based · OCR · liveness · sanctions · SAR
CRL-6IAM, RLS & tenant isolation
4 layers · per-tenant tokens · cross-leak forbidden
CRL-7AI orchestrator
bounded · journaled · replay-safe · 7-yr retention
CRL-8Operator workspace
cases, queues, journals — what ops opens Monday
06Measurable synergy

Eight effects.
None of them are slideware.

Churn reduction
−40 to −55%
heavy fintech-user vs. baseline
Wallet × Identity × Family
CAC reduction
−68%
vs. standalone fintech
Distribution × product
Remittance fee
1.5–2.5%
all-in vs. 6.2% industry
Corridor × on-net settlement
Onboarding time
38s
p95, KYC inherited
BPM × compliance
Fraud / chargeback
−42%
vs. industry baseline
Telco data × risk
Autopay attach
+34pp
on paid packages
Billing × wallet
SME activation
8 min
SIM identity inherited
SME × payments
Time-to-Wave-1
90 days
partner-led
Distribution × control plane
07The 90-day Wave 1 plan

Five phases. One outcome per phase.

This is the actual schedule we run for a Wave-1 telecom deployment. Each phase has a named deliverable a regulator and risk team can read. Wave 1 is not a launch — it is the proof that everything we said works, works.

Day 0 – 14

Perimeter workshop

Map flows, postings, providers, controls. Pin down the licensed entity, the technology entity, and the distribution entity. Name the three things on the same page.

OUTPUT
1-page perimeter brief, regulator-readable
Day 15 – 35

Ledger design + IAM

Double-entry posting model for every flow in scope. Tenant isolation contract — IAM clients, RLS predicates, network boundary, audit-log scope. Sample postings reviewed by sponsor-bank risk team.

OUTPUT
Schema + RLS policies + sample postings
Day 36 – 55

Provider integrations

Sponsor bank, telco billing, KYC vendor, KYT provider. Every integration enters via a typed gateway adapter. Idempotency-keys are required at the boundary, not optional.

OUTPUT
Gateway config + idempotency contract
Day 56 – 75

Operator workspace

The cockpit ops actually opens on Monday morning. Case SLAs, reconciliation comparison, decision journals. Built so the ops team can show a regulator any decision from any case in one click.

OUTPUT
Case queue, reconciliation view, journal export
Day 76 – 90

Hardening + dry-run

SRE, DR/BCP, pentest, regulator dry-run. Sponsor-bank go-live readiness review. First customer postings are not a launch event — they are a verification that everything we said works, works.

OUTPUT
Production-grade Wave 1 wallet
Indicative economics · Wave-1 telco × Coreal deployment

For a tier-1 telco with 12M reachable subscribers, Wave 1 economics typically land in this range. Run the calculator with your own numbers and a one-page PDF report drops out the other side.

Reachable base
10–15M
authenticated daily-active subscribers
Active fintech-users
1.5M
inside telco app at end of Wave-2
Net rev / user
£0.7–1.1
monthly · blended across pools
Annualized
£13–20M
incremental · before retention uplift
Run your own numbers →Book a working sessionCalculator runs entirely in your browser. No inputs leave the page.
08Cross-border corridors

Diaspora money home —
phone to phone, on-net.

Cross-border remittance is a $700B/year market that runs on legacy correspondent banking at 6.2% average all-in fee. Telecoms are uniquely placed to do it cheaper: identity is SIM-bound on both ends, the recipient is already a customer, and the wallet is the destination — not an intermediate IBAN.

Coreal corridor fee
1.5–2.5%
all-in including FX
Industry average
6.2%
World Bank · Q1 2026
Settlement on-net
< 1s
both ends Coreal-powered
Settlement off-net
T+1
sponsor-bank rail
STEP
WHAT HAPPENS
TIME
01

Sender opens app abroad

The diaspora sender (e.g. Ukrainian in Berlin) is a customer of the source telecom. Identity is SIM-bound. They tap the recipient — sister, mother, son — already saved in the family widget by phone number.

< 5s
02

Quote + KYT pre-flight

Coreal's pricing engine quotes the FX with spread (typically 1.5–2.5% all-in vs. 6.2% industry average). KYT screens both legs against sanctions sources and travel-rule databases before any commitment.

< 80ms
03

Sender confirms

FaceID confirms €50. Sender debited in EUR; sender provider account credited. The corresponding home-side leg is queued under the same idempotency key, atomic with the source posting.

instant
04

Corridor crossing

When both sides run on Coreal-powered telecoms, settlement is on-net: a single multi-currency journal with four entries — sender FX out, sender provider in, recipient provider out, recipient FX in. Treasury nets exposures across all customers and hedges externally.

< 1s on-net · T+1 off-net
05

Recipient sees money

Recipient on the home telecom app sees the credit in the wallet, with sender name, message, FX rate. Push notification routes through the carrier, not a third-party. KYT on receive-side completes asynchronously; flagged transfers route to operator workspace.

instant
06

Withdraw / spend

Recipient can hold balance, spend via Coreal-issued card, top up airtime, pay utilities, or cash out via the telco agent network. No outbound IBAN transfer step — the wallet is the destination.

in-flow
WHY IT WORKS

Identity already verified, both ends

Sender is a postpaid telco subscriber abroad. Recipient is a SIM-verified customer at home. Tier-1 KYC inherited from the carrier. No new onboarding flow on either side — and no Western-Union counter to find.

WHY IT WORKS

Recipient is the wallet, not an IBAN

The recipient does not need a bank account. The phone number is the identifier. Money lands in the in-app wallet and is immediately spendable — top-up, card, utility bill, agent cash-out. The IBAN step is optional, not mandatory.

COMPLIANCE

KYT + travel rule on every leg

Each transfer is screened against sanctions sources, travel-rule registries and KYT graphs before any posting clears. Flagged transfers route to the operator workspace; clean transfers settle in under a second.

CHURN

Lock-in for both sides

When mum at home receives money via a specific number, switching telecoms means renegotiating with the family abroad. The corridor produces our biggest observed retention lever — 42% churn reduction on diaspora recipients.

ARCHITECTURE NOTE

The corridor is implemented as a single multi-currency journal entry with four legs (sender FX out / sender provider in / recipient provider out / recipient FX in), atomic under the same idempotency key. Treasury nets exposures across all customers and hedges externally on a managed cadence. When both ends run on a Coreal-powered telecom, no external rail is involved — the corridor is on-net. Off-net corridors settle via a sponsor-bank EUR/local-currency rail at T+1.

CIS reference corridor — diaspora flows from a tier-1 home market

Six EU corridors, ~$10B annual flow, 6%+ industry fees today.

Indicative diaspora-to-home flows for a 15M-subscriber CIS tier-1 mobile operator with active diaspora across the EU. Telco-bound identity on both ends collapses the fee from industry average ~6.2% to a 1.5–2.5% all-in corridor — and keeps the sender + recipient inside the operator's app at every step.

Corridor
Diaspora
Annual flow
Avg ticket
Today's fee
On-net potential
UA → PL
1.5M
$3.5B
$280
6.4%
on-net once partner deploys
UA → DE
1.1M
$2.8B
$310
6.1%
partial — DE has Coreal EMI passport
UA → CZ
550k
$1.2B
$260
6.7%
sponsor-bank rail T+1
UA → IT
380k
$0.9B
$290
6.3%
sponsor-bank rail T+1
UA → ES
350k
$0.8B
$270
6.5%
sponsor-bank rail T+1
UA → UK
290k
$0.7B
$340
5.9%
separate UK FCA scope
Total
~4.2M
~$9.9B
$285 avg
$614M/yr in fees
3–4× cheaper at on-net

Sources: NBU balance-of-payments 2024–2025 estimates, World Bank Migration & Remittances Q1 2026, public migration registries (PL, DE, CZ). Corridor activation depends on partner licence reach and sponsor-bank scope. Activation sequence is staged in the Wave roadmap.

09Business case

From 110M subscribers
to a €370M financial-services line.

Conservative model on the anchor telco's existing footprint — no greenfield acquisition. Funnel and ARPU benchmarks are industry medians (Revolut, N26, Wise, Trade Republic), not partner data.

· YEAR 3 · CONSERVATIVE ·
CONVERSION FUNNEL · ANCHOR TELCO BASE● 7.0M paying
F1Mobile subscribers (anchor markets)
110.0M
100%
Telco anchor footprint, blended postpaid + prepaid
F2Addressable (≥18, smartphone, banked or near-banked)
78.0M
71%
After age, device and KYC-eligibility filters
F3Financial app installs
23.4M
30% of addressable
In-app banner + SIM-bind one-tap onboarding
F4KYC-passed actives (MAU)
11.7M
50% of installs
Tier-1 KYC pass-through, 4-min median
F5Paid-product attach (≥1 financial product)
7.0M
60% of MAU
Card OR cross-border OR invest OR crypto
BLENDED ARPU UPLIFT

On the financial cohort.

TELCO-ONLY ARPU
Voice + data baseline
€11
FINANCIAL-SERVICES ARPU
Across cards · FX · invest · crypto
€53
BLENDED (TELCO + FINANCE)
+5.8× per active financial user
€64
YEAR 3 · ANNUALISED
€370Mnet financial-services revenue
7.0M paying users × €53 blended fin-ARPU

Four product lines.
Each with its own ARPU and unit economics.

· REVENUE MIX · YEAR 3 ·
P1 · EMBEDDED PAYMENTS

Cards & wallet

ATTACH
64%
USERS
4.5M
ARPU
€38/yr
REVENUE DRIVERS

Interchange (1.4–1.8%), FX margin (0.4%), card-issuance fee, ATM out-of-network

N26 / Revolut Standard tier · €30–45 ARPU

P2 · REMITTANCE & FX

Cross-border payments

ATTACH
28%
USERS
2.0M
ARPU
€54/yr
REVENUE DRIVERS

Diaspora corridors, SME B2B, FX spread (0.5–1.2%), fixed transfer fees

Wise active customer · ~£60–80/yr · we model below

P3 · WEALTHTECH

Investments (DCA · roboadviser)

ATTACH
11%
USERS
770k
ARPU
€72/yr
REVENUE DRIVERS

AUM fee (0.45%), spread on FX-equity, securities-lending share, premium tier

Trade Republic / Lightyear · €60–90/yr blended

P4 · RING-FENCED

Crypto · CASP (Wave 5, gated)

ATTACH
6%
USERS
420k
ARPU
€86/yr
REVENUE DRIVERS

Trading spread (0.6–1.0%), conversion fee, staking share

Bitpanda / Coinbase retail · €70–110/yr · MiCA-licensed

10Revenue model

Multi-pool, sequenced.

Pool Awave 1–2

Payment margin

Utilities, card-to-card, bill payments, merchant payments. Low CAC via the telecom app.

Mass · low margin
Pool Bwave 1

Autopay + telco uplift

Reduced churn, higher renewal on paid packages. Effect lands on telco P&L, not the JV.

Defensive · ARPU+
Pool Cwave 2–3

Card economics

Interchange on virtual & physical cards, premium tiers, FX margin.

Mid · scale-driven
Pool Dwave 2–3

Device & BNPL financing

Phones, routers, GPON, smart-home — telco data sharpens underwriting.

Targeted · credit
Pool Ewave 3

SME QR & merchant

Connectivity + payments bundle. SIM + GPON + QR + payouts. Sticky B2B.

B2B · recurring
Pool Fwave 3–4

Remittance corridors

EU↔UA, AZ↔UA/EU diaspora flows. Telco identity beats generic remitters.

Cross-border
Pool Gwave 4

Premium subscription

FX, insurance, support, family bundles. Classic consumer fintech monetization.

High-ARPU
Pool Hwave 4–5

Platform licensing

White-label fintech-as-a-service for the holding group and partners.

B2B platform
INDICATIVE · WAVE 2
1.5M
active fintech-users inside the telecom app
NET REV / USER
$ 0.60–1.00 /mo
blended across pools, before retention uplift
ANNUALIZED
$ 11–18 M
incremental, before churn / GPON / device finance